The Ugly Truth. . .
Howdy y'all!
Yep, it's been a barnburner around here this week. Several new projects starting all at once gobbling up the bandwidth of our employees and making for some long, very long days, and evenings for that matter. Yet, such is life in the business world.
It's not that I haven't been paying attention to world events, because I have being the full-blown news junkie that I am, but just haven't really had much commentary to add and there are plenty of others who beat me to the punch anyway. Not to mention, they probably write gooder than me.
I do want to touch on one topic of discussion that I haven't seen a terrific amount of commentary on. Or maybe I'm just not looking in the right places, like super-flamer/straight-people-with-morals-hating-pig Perez Hilton, or on TMZ.com or some other gossipy total waste of space on the internet.
The topic I have chosen for today's discussion is People Magazine's 100 Most Beautiful People issue. Granted, there are a lot of lovely looking human beings on this planet, each different, some cataclysmically attractive, others less appealing, yet attractive in a more subtle fashion, but to whittle the list down to 100 is a daunting task and People Magazine fails miserably.
And this year, People Magazine, which is a subsidiary of Time-Warner who also owns HBO, CNN, Entertainment Weekly and Soaplife(wut?), has a special section called "Barack's Beauties" for the dear reader to peruse. Or to wipe one's ass with (life is full of choices).
Barack's Beauties include tax-evader-in-chief Timothy Geithner whose forehead is so big they have to track it with an airborne xenon-laser-guided, phased array, protonic microwave radar system so that he doesn't intefere with the flight paths of migratory waterfowl or create his own weather patterns.
Other than that, he's kinda cute I guess. In a creepy, perverted-Uncle Jimmy kinda way. I think a better list for Tim to be on would be the 100 Most Evasive or 100 Most-Likely To Wear Women's Underwear. Or All-Time Most Squirrely Person Ever.
Another selection from Barack's Beauties is chief-asshole (or dingleberry, right El Rod?) Rahmn Emmanuel, whose subtle brown, but bugging-right-out-of-his-head eyes would make a naked mole rat run to a mirror and admire his own beauty in relief.
Hey, look what I found, Rahmn Emmanuel just waking up after a cup of coffee:
Of course, since Time-Warner is in the back pocket of the Obama administration (the evidence is in the car Junior) it is only fitting that they throw Michelle Obama in there as well. She's so Jackie. Or is it Jacqui? Or Ja'Qui?
Heaven help us if she is the "new" beautiful, just like 40 is the new 30 (bullshit) and, and, and, uh u uh, um, ah, ah, um , uh. . .Shamwow's can get you laid(or put in jail!) by ugly $1500 a night call girls.
Here is a simple eye test. Who is more beautiful?
Case Closed!
You got it Burnt. Starting to think that the D, in Washington D stands for "Dingleberry".
The God Damn place seems loaded with that, ummm..shit. Mainly 'cause there ain't nothin' but shitheads there.
OH, now THAT is a "Pinto", I'd love to drive. He-He-He...OH YEAH!
BTW Mr. Shamow is lucky he had his tongue in there instead of...well, you know.
Little old for the Vienna Boys Choir and they don't pay as well...LOL.
I am guilty of neglect and chose this Post when I dropped in, just find the Great El Campeador preceded me. His views and my views concur with yours on the subject under discussion. In fact, he has a better one of the first lady above. As far as Time, CNN and the other rags in that trash group is concerned I could say a lot more, but I still try to suppress a burning obsession to avoid profanity at something that I despise.
On a lighter note though, here is my Post on Scruffy. It’s been dedicated to you. I will get to do James Herriot in the near future. He is in the same class as Gallico but they approach it from two different ends [wait for me to do it]. Thanks my friend. It goes thee well and I hope you enjoy:
One of the best Animal Stories ever [one] – Scruffy, by Paul Gallico
I have just realized I want to add another point as I am not so sure that you are correct about Time Warner being in Obama’s back pocket. I have a feeling he is in their’s.